The Underlying Violence of the Rabid Left

Imagine if a male journalist wrote an article advocating which women he'd like to rape. Do you think there'd be a large outcry from everyone, especially women's groups?

I'd certainly hope so. But apparently not if the women in question happen to be conservatives. Such is the case with Guy Cimbalo, who yesterday wrote that he'd like to "Hate F*ck" (ie. rape) the following women:

1. Amanda Carpenter
2. Dana Perino
3. Elisabeth Hasselbeck
4. Laura Ingraham
5. Mary Katharine Ham
6. Michelle Malkin
7. Megyn Kelly
8. Michelle Bachman
9. Pamela Geller
10. Peggy Noonan

Who would ever have thought that in the so-called progressive times we live in that mainstream writers would publicly say such things and that the outcry against them by mainstream women's groups was absolutely silent. Shame! Absolute & Utter Shame!!

More Peaceful Muslims

This is what happened in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida on December 30th, 2008. Watch & listen carefully:

Here's a news story on the same.

On the CAIR website there is not yet any condemnation of what this woman said. Do you think that will change anytime soon?

I fully support this woman's right to free speech. In fact, permitting free speech draws such cockroaches out from the dark corners where they hide. But the fact that no major Muslim organizations will condemn her publicly speaks volumes.

A Sampling of "Moderate" Muslims

Facebook is a strange & peculiar place at times. Any user is able to create any group that they wish. Many of these groups are public, which anyone can join. Several Muslims have decided to create different versions of "I Hate Israel" groups. Thousands, upon thousands, of people have joined. Perhaps these would be the "moderate" Muslims we keep hearing about?








If you're a Facebook member, then take a look at this group. Here's a sampling of some of the comments therein:

• "if israel was a person, i wont kill em until it get the worst toprture ever, fuck israel fuck everybody who support israel" - Youssef Karmoun, University of Malaga Grad Student, Spain
• "Israel is a FAKE country, not even a country, just a band of criminals!!" - Said Ghaleb, Morocco
• "STOP EXPLAINING AND APOLOGIZIN,YES i hate jewish.they paid & still paying 2 kill palestinians and hve th3ir own country on other's land,coz they r nawar gitanes thiefs murderers sneeky and liars,every single jewish is paying tax to israel.we have to make them feel what they made palestinians feel, i hate jewish here & there & everywhere.maya from lebannnnnnnnoooooooooooooo
  ooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.proud to hate jewish,wait for us & u will see.i hve a wish:get invited to where i can find jewish,i wish to take the revenge of GAZA." - Rana Sabouni
• "hatred is not enough let's do something more .these SAUVAGES and MURDERERS ?DESERVE MORE THAN JUST HATRE" - Hanaa Naoumi
• "We should all pray to Allah to eradicate Izrael!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  !!!!!!!!!! (But Oh!!Well we have known since the creation of the Qu'ran Al Kareem that the situation in Palestine was going to remain this way or perhaps get even worse)" - Alaoui Fdili Zineb, Richmond UK 2011 student, London
• "NO way to accept the crimes comited in Palestine today, just like we never accepted the crimes comited in 2006 in Lebanon. We don't hate israel because of their nationality, their race, their religion or they colour of skin, but only beacause of they are Killers and nothing else. And this is note antisemitism, beacause of they are Ashkenaze, and Ashkenaze are from Europe, and caucasian, not hebrew! (even if their religion is judaism)" - Salim C.
• "join us all against israel group from austria" - Samir Oulhaj, FH Technikum Wien Grad Student, Austria (Note: There's something more than a little spooky about the coincidence of where this fellow lives! Also, his first name has 5 letters and his last name has 6. Hmmm, who does that remind me of?!?)
• "Allahu Akbar! When Israelis commit Genocide, they call it self defense! When Palestinians defend themselves, the media calls it terrorism! Allah will decide between the two parties!" - Drew AnZhu Ahmad Marshall, Delaware Alumni 2007, Delaware USA

Welcome to 2009! :-(

One of the Radical Left's Unexpected Consequences

There are often unintended consequences with every government policy. For the sake of argument, I'll accept that the creators of every public policy have positive intentions. But much too often the policies of the Radical Left (e.g. the NDP and certain elements of the Liberals in Canada) have a number of unintended negative consequences.

For decades now the politically correct set of the Left have been telling everyone that Christmas is strictly a Christian holiday and allowing it to be celebrated more broadly is hurting non-Christian minorities. Whether it has been scenes of Christ's birthplace on public property, the use of Christmas trees, or wishing someone Merry Christmas, all of these things have become politically incorrect actions.

There is no doubt that such anti-Christmas / anti-Christian campaigns have opened the door wide open for the likes of Anjem Choudary:

The lawyer, who recently praised the Mumbai terror attacks, urged all Muslims to reject traditional Christmas celebrations, claiming that they are forbidden by Allah.

The 41-year-old shocked Christians and even those of his own faith by branding yuletide festivities as "the pathway to hellfire".

Choudary, who is chairman of the Society of Muslim Lawyers, ruled out all celebrations, including having a Christmas tree, decorating the house or eating turkey.

In the sermon posted on an Islamic website, he said: "In the world today many Muslims, especially those residing in western countries, are exposed to the evil celebration Christmas.

---

It is true that the politically correct set are not directly responsible for Mr. Choudary's diatribe. But to take no responsibility whatsoever for laying the groundwork for him & his ilk is irresponsible to the extreme.

Recently I documented an example of how allowing the disparaging of an identifiable group can lead to harm much more significant than mere words. From an historical perspective it's easy to see the step-by-step progression of how German Nazis:

1. Dehumanized Jews
2. Imprisoned them
3. Murdered them en masse

At the present time we have countless "progressives" who see nothing wrong with keeping up a constant barrage of verbal attacks and dehumanization of Christians and their traditions. I can only imagine what's going on in the minds of the perpetrators: "It's in fashion, 'everyone' is doing it, it's what the Kool Kids are doing!" So it's very clear that Step #1 is well under way.

"Yes, but we can never get to Step #2!", some will immediately respond. Really? Maybe not quite yet but then how would you explain what happened to Christian Pastor Stephen Boissoin earlier this year? I don't agree with his views but it has become perfectly clear that he was prosecuted by the Alberta HRC solely because he's a Christian. If you doubt that then you're not up to speed with what has recently happened in Quebec.

Coming full circle, I am absolutely in favour of Anjem Choudary being able to say whatever pleases his little heart. But it's then the responsibility of all concerned citizens to speak out against him.

Radical Leftist Exposed

I thought I had heard some crazy things before but this surely takes the gold medal prize. Scroll down and listen to the audio recording. So much incredible anger in that woman! You can visit her website here.

Carleton University: White Males Not Wanted

Who says the Radical Left doesn't have its favourites when it comes to hate?!? In the case of the Carleton University Students Association they have now officially voted it perfectly fine for white males to suffer much and die young.

"Whereas Cystic fibrosis has been recently revealed to only affect white people, and primarily men.... Be it resolved that: CUSA discontinue its support of this campaign." [Source]

Of course that's not the way they're trying to spin it, but that's precisely what happened at a recent vote, where it was decided that annual fundraising for Cystic Fibrosis Research was to be discontinued on a regular basis. One of the reasons cited was that this terrible disease “has been recently revealed to only affect white people, and primarily men" — and therefore is insufficiently “inclusive.”

If you don't immediately grasp the audacity of this, what would your reaction be to these hypothetical quotes:

• "We're going to discontinue annual fundraising for breast cancer research because it's a disease that mostly affects women and is therefore insufficiently inclusive."
• "We're going to discontinue annual fundraising for AIDS research because it's a disease that mostly affects gay men and is therefore insufficiently inclusive."
  

There must be a power shortage in Ottawa because there are some really dim bulbs on the Carleton student council. So much so that there's a delicious irony to this story. An irony so deep that it could swallow the entire Carleton campus. As Jonathan Kay points out, the research used by these students prior to their vote was completely flawed:

Approximately 1 in 25 people of European descent … is a carrier of a cystic fibrosis mutation. Although CF is less common in these groups, approximately 1 in 46 Hispanics, 1 in 65 Africans and 1 in 90 Asians carry at least one abnormal CFTR gene. Cystic fibrosis is diagnosed in males and females equally.

Does Carleton represent our best & brightest minds in the under-25 set, our smartest lads and lasses from across the nation?!? I think not. But who knows, fueled by such venomous political correctness and a disinterest in facts & truth, they'd be absolutely perfect for employment at the various "Human Rights" Commissions across the country. There's a rumour going around that there'll be lots of people fired there soon. Someone should suggest to the "geniuses" at Carleton to start applying soon!

---

Update
Jonathan Kay was forwarded this letter from a hospital worker, who sent it to each fo the Student Council Executive members:

To whom it may concern:

I am astounded at the pathetic display of ignorance and the lack of basic humanity that is illustrated in your recent decision to remove Student Council support for the cause of Cystic Fibrosis. You may try to couch this decision in terms of just trying to spread the charitable dollars around, but it's obvious to even to most casual observer that this is simply damage control, from a Council that did not do their homework thoroughly in the first place.

I work at a major Children's Hospital, directly with the young sufferers of this terrible disease. Over the past 15 years, I have seen them and their families struggle against huge odds to survive, even to their 20th birthday. They are in hospital every 6 weeks for their entire lives, undergoing almost constant respiratory therapy. They are courageous, wise and wonderful children.

They come from many walks of life, are equally male and female, and sometimes there are multiple children in the household who have the condition. I have had families who lost both children before the age of 18. This is a tragic illness that does not deserve to be treated as a political-correctness pawn.

Last week, one of my favourite patients, whom I have been seeing for over 8 years, died just short of her 15th birthday, through massive hemorrhaging in the lungs. Two weeks before, she had been a lively, if unbelievably thin teenager, dressing up for Halloween, and helping other, smaller kids get their costumes ready. I went to her memorial, which was attended by over 250 adults and children of all races, and we mourned the passing of such a wonderful soul.

I left the service, heard the news of your decision on the radio, and was sickened by it. How closed-minded can our supposedly educated student bodies be? This girl was looking forward to attending a University, just as you are able to do, in your arrogant self-righteousness and good health. Do you refuse support for Ovarian Cancer, because it only afflicts women? Do you do the same for Alzheimer's, because it affects primarily the elderly? You have to give your heads a shake, apologize, and be better informed in the future.

This decision is a disgrace.

Paul Hooson

The Deranged, Hateful Left

"But there are fringe elements on both sides", we're always told. No, Mr./Ms. Obama Supporter, those who attacked this girl were mainstream folks JUST LIKE YOU ... or possibly & precisely YOU! Point out someone on the elusive "moderate left" and I'll ask for proof of their public condemnation of situations like this. Failure to provide it and they remain in the Radical Left Hate Camp where us true moderates always suspected them to be.

Promoting Balanced Views and Free Speech in Canada

Over the past 2 months I've listened to a larger variety of talk radio in the U.S. One thing that many down there are convinced of is that Academia (primary school to university) and most of the MSM are completely infested with 95%+ Leftists. Not just Mildly Left or sort of Left, but Extreme Left.

I suspect they are right. Anyone who thinks that this hasn't had an enormous effect on brainwashing countless people over the past 40 years toward the very perverted value system of the Extreme Left is deluding themselves.

It got me thinking about the situation in Canada. Our CBC is on the Extreme Left. CTV and Global are a bit different but mostly seems pro-Liberal Party. All of the newspapers except the National Post seem Mildly Left to Extreme Left.

It's difficult to change private sector institutions other than to stop supporting them. But the CBC *should be* much easier to change because they're paid for by our tax dollars.

Once the U.S. election is over I would love to start a grassroots campaign to write the head of CBC News and see what changes he has effected based on his promise to do so after the Mallick affair. My guess is that to date it has been zero to none. So then the CBC Ombudsman needs to be contacted en masse until the promised change occurs.

This could be connected with a petition to the Conservative Party demanding that such changes to the CBC be made and the Hate Speech Provisions of the HRCs be scrapped. Once they do so, those of us pledging donations to their party will carry forth as promised. Until then, not a cent.

To me this sounds like minimal time & energy from each supporter for maximum gain. Clearly we need a larger, more effective way to dramatically change Canadian public opinion. Put another way, for the first time in at least 40 years Canadians will be presented with a balanced set of views and can then make up their own minds. Much like I've been able to do with some Canadians, albeit one person at a time.

P.S. I wonder if Ezra Levant, Mark Steyn, and Jonathan Kay would be willing to spread the word? Goodness knows that North America will need more balanced views than ever before once the Extreme Leftists in an Obamanation implement the Unfairness Doctrine and likely effect a number of other things to kill free speech that they disagree with.

Sandra Bernhard: Just Another Compassionate Liberal

Sandra Bernhard, the outspoken (and often unfunny) comedian has launched a new one-woman show called “Without You I’m Nothing”. Here's a snippet of a review of her performance in the Washington Examiner by a writer named Barbara Mackay:

In Sandra Bernhard’s new show, “Without You I’m Nothing” at Theater J, she kvetches continually, whether she’s sneering at vacuous celebrity-speak from a fashion magazine, mocking mediocre singers or voicing contempt for Sarah Palin.

But in the end, oddly and subtly, Bernhard’s message is positive.

Interesting, because Ms. Mackay fails to mention that this is part of her show:

Sandra warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers.

"Gang rape" is a positive message? Just hilarious what passes for humor in the minds of hate-filled liberals these days. Perhaps the biggest joke of all is that they keep on insisting that we refer to them as "progressives".

---

Update: Michelle Malkin has further details. Here in Canada we have "human rights" commissions that monitor supposed hate speech, though everyone knows that said speech must come from a so-called conservative or it's ignored. So Bernhard would be found innocent by their standards.

However, in this case it could be argued that she is inciting violence against a specific person, namely Sarah Palin. In such a case, she could be prosecuted in a real court under Canada's federal hate speech legislation. Ezra Levant is on vacation right now but it would be most interesting to get his opinion on this when he returns!

Eve Ensler - The Heather Mallick of the U.S.

If you'd like to see how deeply PDS has infected some, read this hate-filled diatribe by Eve Ensler. Seems to be reminiscent of her fellow deranged Canadian cousin, Heather Mallick.

Let me respond directly to some of the things she wrote:

I don't like raging at women. I am a Feminist and have spent my life trying to build community, help empower women and stop violence against them. It is hard to write about Sarah Palin. This is why the Sarah Palin choice was all the more insidious and cynical. The people who made this choice count on the goodness and solidarity of Feminists.
You claim to not like raging at women but then go on to spew more venom than even a King Cobra snake (or Queen Cobra if you prefer). You allude to the "goodness and solidarity of Feminists" before illustrating that there is no "goodness" in your hate piece whatsoever. The only solidarity that you & your ilk have is how much vile bile you can spew out at Sarah Palin and by extension any Americans who disagree with your narrow world view.


But everything Sarah Palin believes in and practices is antithetical to Feminism which for me is part of one story -- connected to saving the earth, ending racism, empowering women, giving young girls options, opening our minds, deepening tolerance, and ending violence and war.
You really mean "antithetical to Radical Leftist Feminism" but are too disingenuous to admit it. Sarah Palin is very much a feminist. Furthermore, using your own words, let's look at what you're really saying about Palin: She is trying to destroy the earth, in support of racism, disenfranchising women, giving young girls no options, closing the minds of fellow women, encouraging intolerance, and promoting violence and war.

Do you know the meaning of the phrase, "deep irony"? You're charging a woman who is running for vice-president of the United States of America as disenfranchising women and giving young girls no options? Even one of your gal pals, Judith Warner, has realized how incredibly incorrect your assertion is. Do you even realize, Ms. Ensler, that if you said this about a regular person that you'd be found guilty on multiple counts of libel?!? Indeed, "truth" is a defense, but you're not speaking on the side of truth.


I believe that the McCain/Palin ticket is one of the most dangerous choices of my lifetime, and should this country chose those candidates the fall-out may be so great, the destruction so vast in so many areas that America may never recover.
Such insane rhetoric has just guaranteed McCain-Palin more votes. Many more votes!


Sarah Palin does not much believe in thinking. From what I gather she has tried to ban books from the library, has a tendency to dispense with people who think independently.
No Ms. Ensler, YOU do not believe in independent thinking. She did not try to ban books from the library, no matter how many times you wish to repeat this lie. When it comes to asserting that someone else does not believe in thinking, 3 words come to mind: Pot, Kettle, Black.


Sarah believes in guns. She has her own custom Austrian hunting rifle. She has been known to kill 40 caribou at a clip. She has shot hundreds of wolves from the air.
Do you actually understand that your liberal elitist view that no American should be allowed to go hunting only exists amongst a radical minority in America? Your comment about her shooting wolves from the air is a LIE. The Alaskan Aerial Predator program was enacted to cull the wolf population (and bears in some areas) so as to expand the numbers of moose and caribou. Are you a moose-ist and caribou-ist, Ms Ensler? As for Sarah Palin killing "40 caribou at a clip", can we see the proof please?! Or did this vision of her only occur in your dreams? Ancillary question: Do you eat meat?


Sarah believes in God. That is of course her right, her private right.

But you don't like very much that she believes in God, do you Ms. Ensler? It's pretty scary for you that she does, isn't it?! Quick question: How come Barack Obama's Christian beliefs have never been a source of controversy?


Toward the end of her piece she epouses this great piece of wisdom:

If the Polar Bears don't move you to go and do everything in your power to get Obama elected then consider the chant that filled the hall after Palin spoke at the RNC, "Drill Drill Drill." I think of teeth when I think of drills. I think of rape. I think of destruction. I think of domination. I think of military exercises that force mindless repetition, emptying the brain of analysis, doubt, ambiguity or dissent. I think of pain.
I'm too busy shaking my head to say much. I guess being a former mining engineer makes me a rapist. At least in your tiny, extremely radical left-wing mind.

Heather Mallick: Liberal Elitist Trash

Just when one thought the personal attacks against Sarah Palin couldn't get any worse, coming out of the taxpayer funded CBC we have the most vile one yet. If you can't get through it without wanting to smash your computer monitor, then you can read a summary here:

...Sarah Palin ... fit of pique ... the white trash vote ... sexual inadequates ... she isn't even female really ... Alaska hillbilly ... "white trash" ... trailer trash ... rural, loud, proudly unlettered ... toned-down version of the porn actress ... overtreated hair, puffy lips ... "pramface" ... roughneck fuckin' redneck ... prodding his daughter ... ratboy ... fizzing with rage and revenge ... vicious and profoundly dishonest ... good fast listing... nervous wreck with deeply strange hair ... the hick vote ... ordinary hillbilly ... racism? ... racism ... "rectal fissure" ... tense no-hoper ladies ... white female marginals ...

And all of this from one Heather Mallick, who would tell you with great conviction that she is an objective journalist and classy woman. Clearly neither is true. She's the postergirl for what one might term as a "blueneck".

I believe in free speech. Absolutely. But has not Ms. Mallick crossed a line ... wayyyyyy over?! Had this been a conservative journalist saying such things, what do you think the repercussions would have been?

Also, should Canadian women who live in rural Canada still have to pay anything toward the CBC? Perhaps the percentage of funding coming from rural Canada should be cut for a year and then Ms. Mallick can explain why to her colleagues?

I won't be launching a hate speech complaint against her with the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission, but I have to wonder if the American Embassy in Ottawa might demand an apology. Never have I seen something this dreadfully hateful & pathetic in the Canadian media.

---

Update: Here are some interesting comments on the CBC site:

To any Americans checking out this site: This vile woman, Heather Mallick, does not speak for the vast majority of Canadians. She lives in a part of the country so full of itself, so out-of-touch with reality, that they continue to elect no-good Liberals who have done nothing for this country but divide the country, lie, cheat and steal millions of our tax-payer dollars. I will defend Mallick's right to say stupid things, but I also have the right to tell her how stupid and ignorant she is. And you are seeing plenty of backlash on this site from plenty of Canadians.

Ms Mallick is neither a journalist nor a feminist. Typical liberal who has the audacity to lump all those persons who do not possess a "MA in English" into the white trash category. It's interesting to note that that very demographic is who the democrats profess to work for - ' the blue collar worker', the poor, the undereducated, etc. Why then are Obama's supporter's often upper class, rich, university educated people with ideals towards a utopian society with little understanding of the realistic applications or consequences of these world views. They should get out into their own communities a do some community organizing themselves if they really want to effect change where they live.

Palin not female! What's that supposed to mean? You may not agree with her politics, but I would think that if you are indeed a feminist that you would appreciate what she has accomplished as a woman - and to think, she did it without an ivy league education.

Yeah, Heather, yeah, get it out of your system: Republican men are "sexual inadequacies", Republican woman belong to "Citizen's for a Tackier America", and Sarah Palin, Sarah Palin, she's "white trash" an "Alaska Hillbilly" (clever, that one), "not even a female, really", they're shitty parents...and on and on and on. And yet, despite all the vitriol, Heather, depite the loathing, and reguritated bile you still prove yourself to be a coward. You don't just despise Republicans in general and Sarah Palin in particular for their lack of sophistication (which you, of course, have by the carload), their country, lowbrow, crotch-scratching vulgarity (which is so foreign to urban royalty like, well like YOU), what you want and don't have the guts to say is that you want to see them dead. Filth like that isn't fit to even live, right Heather? Moral, social, intellectual degenerates like them filthy up and dilute the gene pool. See, Palin even has a retard kid. She could have aborted it, too like a decent woman would but she DIDN'T. She's a mad dog and deserves to die, doesn't she, Heather?

Why don't you have some real guts and say what you REALLY mean, Heather? Stalin did. Che did. They were the kind of uber men you're modelling, aren't they? A real woman doesn't hold back. Go on, Heather, go for broke. Let us see you in full. I'm sure people would be impressed and you'd win even more people to your side. Your kind of person would love it. They always do.

Just read Heather Mallick. Wow I always had just great respect for Canadians - I am so disappointed. I thought you were all so above this sort of thing

Her white trash article on Sarah Pailin is not worth repeating - for shame for shame for shame - how dare you call her white trash - and who are you to be so smug, condescending and elitist? Who made you God?

I am an educated independent who shoots arrows, guns, am a hockey mom, a gymnast mom, a tennis mom, a musical theater mom and an opera mom, wow I must be white trash - who knew.. and I work for Harvard!

Sarah Palin is a real person, a breath of fresh air - she is all of us: hockey moms with tough lives, families, careers and smarts. I hope she wins and puts you all to shame.

The Battleground Poll

In preparation for a discussion on BBC London Radio this evening, I wanted to get the very latest figures on how Americans view themselves politically. I quickly found the renowned Battleground Poll. The most recent version was carried out and published in August 2008.

Here are the raw figures. Please go to Page 16 and refer to question 'D3'. Here is the question and the results:

When thinking about politics and government, do you consider yourself to be . . .

• Very conservative.........................................................20%
• Somewhat conservative................................................40%
• Moderate......................................................................2%
• Somewhat liberal.........................................................27%
• Very liberal ..................................................................9%
• Unsure/Refused............................................................3%

Note: "Moderate" and "Unsure / Refused" were not given out as possibilities to each respondent but were recorded if that's the way the person answered the question.

Writer, Bruce Walker, provides his analysis of these results here.

---

Without knowing these actual statistics, I've always intuitively believed that America is fundamentally a moderate, center right nation. This just confirms that, more substantially than I could have ever imagined.

It also explains why there's an ever growing outrage at the vile, hateful comments made by DailyKos writers, British comedians, and some members of the MSM. Such people might think they're being pithy and brilliant. To the 36% on the left they're speaking to the choir but to the 60%+ they're just guaranteeing a vote for the Republicans.

Just Imagine . . .

David Berner is an acquaintance of mine. He's a good fellow and I agree with him on many issues. But not the current U.S. election. Here's his latest post.

Now look through the comments, keeping in mind that many of his readers hail from Metro Vancouver. Specifically be sure to look at the one underneath of mine:

David, it's called inbreeding. Lil miss creepy, from Frozen Armpits Alaska hasn't a clue about the real world and retreats to her Hollywood version of the USA and when that fails, she retreats even further to the Bible and her narrow interpretation of it.

God help us all if she were to be president. It would give new meaning to the sad Secret Service joke, If President Bush (Senior) dies in office, shoot Dan Quail.

This is what passes for liberal intelligentsia in Canada. Now, just imagine if a person ever made such a vile comment about Barack Obama.

---

YouTube Version (direct link) :

Mark Steyn is Back!

Not full time but he couldn't resist commenting this morning, after Sarah Palin's great speech last night. You can read him here and here.

A segment of the second item deserves to be reprinted:

As National Review's in-house demography bore, I've been struck this last week by the left's fierce hostility to Sarah Palin's fecundity. One gentleman - well, okay, maybe not a "gentleman" but certainly an impeccably sensitive progressive new male - wrote to me from Shelton, Washington:

This abortion prohibitionist hag won’t cut it among women with brains. And BTW she is a good example of reproduction run amok. 5 kids; 1 retard. I wonder if the bitch ever heard of getting spayed.

Each to her own, Mister Sensitive.

Just Another Typical Obama Supporter

This one's a white priest:

This is a Man of God? Right! Just confirms why I'm a Recovering Catholic.

The Danger of Rhetoric

Fitna, the movie:


Jeremiah Wright:


Pat Robertson:


I've got to believe that there's a special place in hell for these people who use "God" to justify their rampant hate.