Is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad The Next Adolf Hitler?
This article makes one wonder what the near future holds. Me thinks "scary"!
Of course, many in the West think it inconceivable that Iran would attack Israel with nuclear weapons. The forefathers of these same people were convinced that Hitler would never attack the other countries in Europe. Where the truth lies, only the future knows . . . .
4 comments:
Meanwhile, Mussolini, err...I mean Bush is having troubles with his occupation of Ethiopia, err...I mean Iraq.
Oh wait, or did I confuse Bush with Stalin and his Winter War with Finland?
The fact that you're equivocating a leader of a tyrannical dictatorship with the democratically elected leader of a Western nation speaks volumes about your twisted view of the world. Sad.
Aggression is aggression is aggression regardless of the fact of how an aggressive leader came to power in the first place.
Or do you somehow believe because an initiator of an aggressive war happens to be a democratically elected leader, the whole idea of using aggression and force to change the world now becomes kosher?
How is it that you excuse the aggression of a leader on their own people?
Following your belief system, the oppressive leaders of Darfur, Afghanistan, North Korea, Syria should be left alone to do what ever harm they like to their own people.
Why do you have such little respect and more likely disdain for such peoples?
Post a Comment